Filtek Z350 XT
Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet
IFU Link
Claim 1:
Direct posterior restorations (including occlusal surfaces)
Claim 2:
Direct anterior restorations
Claim 3:
Core build-ups
Claim 4:
Splinting
Claim 5:
Indirect restorations / inlays, onlays
Claim 6:
Indirect restorations / veneers
Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
(c) RCHSR
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
Claim 1:
Berti LS, Turssi CP, Amaral FL, Basting RT, Junqueira JLC, Panzarella FK, Reis AF, França FM. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of high viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations. Am J Dent. 2020 Aug;33(4):213-217.
Olegário IC; Alvarez-Velasco PdL; Raggio DP; Parisotto T; Imparato JCP. Sobrevida de resina compuesta y cemento de ionómero de vidrio de bajo costo para TRA: 1 año de seguimiento de un ensayo clínico aleatorizado. Odontología. 2018; 20(1): 88-106.
Claims 2 - 6:
none found
ZHANG Yao,ZHANG Si-chen,WAN Lin,CAO Yu. Clinical effect of gingival retraction combined with flowable composite resin as a liner for restoring dental wedgeshaped defects. Beijing J Stoma 2015; 23: 160.
Araújo JF, Barros TA, Braga EM, Loretto SC, Silva e Souza Pde A, Silva e Souza MH. One-year evaluation of a simplified ethanol-wet bonding technique: a randomized clinical trial. Braz Dent J. 2013;24(3):267-72.
Hussainy SN, Nasim I, Thomas T, Ranjan M. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;21(5):510-515.
Singh C, Kaur K, Kapoor K. Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An in vivo one-year comparative evaluation. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Oct-Dec;37(4):372-377.
LIU Yuheng. Comparison of the efects of different m aterials
/
bonding system s combined with gingival retraction in the restoration of subgingivalwedge-shaped defect.Mod Hosp 2017; 17: 400.
Correia A, Jurema A, Andrade MR, Borges A, Bresciani E, Caneppele T. Clinical Evaluation of Noncarious Cervical Lesions of Different Extensions Restored With Bulk-fill or Conventional Resin Composite: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Oper Dent. 2020 Jan/Feb;45(1):E11-E20.
Pani S.Comparison of high viscosity glass ionomer cement to composite restorations placed in primary teeth under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent J 2018; 28: 154.
XU Yan,WU Qing-ju,LUO Li-ping,JIN Shi-qing.Evaluation of the clinical efect of fluoride coating com bined with pit and fissure sealing or preventive resin filling on prevention of first permanent molars caries. Shanghai J Stom 2018; 27: 298.
none found